SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 1091

ARAVIND KUMAR, BELLUNKE A.S.
Vanita – Appellant
Versus
Gantesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mrutyunjaya S. Hallikeri, Adv., K.L. Patil, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Aravind Kumar, J.

1. Wife has filed this appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed in MC No.59/2017, whereunder petition filed under Sections 13(1)(ia)(ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short "the Act") came to be allowed.

2. The marriage between respondent and appellant came to be solemnized on 11.05.2015 at Gadag as per custom prevailing in their community. Out of said wedlock, a female child was born on 19.03.2016. It was the grievance of the respondent-husband that when his parents had visited his in-laws are said to have not extended proper respect and has abused them. Hence, contending that he had physically and mentally suffered, he returned back to Bijapur to look after the welfare of child and the appellant and at that point of time also wife had abused him. He further states that panchayat was held by the elders of the family as wife had without any reasonable cause had deserted him. Hence, contending that he had issued a legal notice on 20.04.2017, had filed petition in question for dissolution of his marriage solemnized on 11.05.2015.

3. Notice came to be issued by the learned trial Judge by order dated 31.05.2015 and on 21.06.2017, respondent w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top