B.A.PATIL
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Fatimabi M. Shaikh, D/o M. A. Shaikh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.A. Patil, J.
Heard the learned HCGP on I.A.No.1/2019. The said application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay. With the consent of the learned HCGP, the same is taken up for final disposal.
2. The case of the complainant in brief is that the complainant is a Drug Officer. He received a credible information that the accused No.1 - partnership firm running in the name of M/s. Bhawar Inc Corporation. Accused Nos.2 - 5 are the partners of the firm. Accused No.6 is the partnership firm and the accused No.7 is the Branch in-charge of the said office. They are dealing with the Drugs without there being any valid and effective license. On 07.03.2016, he accompanied with two witnesses visited the accused-firm. At that time the accused No.7 was present. There they found stocked Vicks Action 500 plus bearing Batch No.602005623037 without license. The said tablets have been seized by drawing a mahazar and sent them for analysis test. After receiving the report and after obtaining necessary permission from the Government, the complaint has been filed on 18.03.2019. After filing of the charge sheet the accused No.7 appeared and insofar as in respe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.