SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Kar) 1244

L.NARAYANA SWAMY, R.DEVDAS
Narayanappa – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.V. Susheela, Adv., I. Tharanath Poojary, Adv., Bipin Hegde, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

R. Devdas, J.

1. The petitioner who was the 3rd respondent before the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') is before this Court being aggrieved of the order dated 08.01.2019, passed by the Tribunal.

2. The petitioner and the 3rd respondent are serving in the cadre of Senior Sub-Registrars. By notification dated 30.07.2018, the respondent State Government transferred about 122 Senior Sub-Registrars/Sub-Registrars and in the said notification, the petitioner, who was then serving as Sub-Registrar, Hesaraghatta, was transferred as Sub-Registrar, Molakalmuru, while the 3rd respondent who was serving as Sub-Registrar, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru, was transferred as Sub-Registrar, Shivajinagar, Bengaluru. However, by another notification dated 30.10.2018, the petitioner, who was under transfer to Molakalmuru, stood transferred to the place of the 3rd respondent, as Sub-Registrar, Shivajinagar, Bengaluru. Under the same notification, the 3rd respondent was transferred from Shivajinagar, Bengaluru to Head Office, Bengaluru, to a vacant post. The 3rd respondent herein approached the Tribunal in application No.7790/2018, seeking quashment of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top