K.NATARAJAN
Arun Aravind Habbu S/o Late Sri Arvind Habbuand – Appellant
Versus
Archana Prabhakar, W/o Arun Arvind Habbu – Respondent
ORDER :
This revision petition is filed by the petitioners being aggrieved by the order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-III, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as ‘Trial Court’) in Crl. Misc.No.65/2018, dated 15.10.2018 and the same was upheld by the LXVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Court, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as ‘First Appellate Court’) in Crl.A.No.2147/2018, dated 05.09.2019.
2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondent.
3. The case of the petitioners is that the respondent/wife filed a petition before the trial Court under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short ‘D.V. Act’) against these petitioners claiming relief under various provisions of the D.V. Act and also seeking maintenance from these petitioners. The trial Court also granted interim maintenance to the child at Rs.4,000/- per month. After appearance, the petitioners filed objections contending that the petition is not maintainable as it was not filed in the form prescribed under Rule 6(1) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules, 2006 (for short D.V.Rules) and prayed for dismissing the pe
G.M.Siddeshwar vs. Prasanna Kumar
General Insurance Council and others vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and others
General Secretary, Vokkaligara Sangha, Bangalore and another vs. R.Chandramouli and others
Smt. Laxmavva vs. The State of Karnataka represented by its Secretary and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.