K.SOMASHEKAR
Pankaj A Parekh S/o late Anantharai L. Parekh – Appellant
Versus
State by CBI, ACB Ganganagar, Bellary Road Bangalore – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
As all these appeals arise out of a common judgment and award, they are heard together and are disposed of by this common order.
2. Crl.A.No.432/2010 is preferred by accused No.2 Shri Pankaj A. Parekh; Crl.A.No.433/2010 is preferred by accused No.3 – Smt. Asha P. Parekh; Crl.A.No.434/2010 is preferred by accused No.4 – Sri. Venkatesha and Crl.A.No.448/2010 is preferred by Accused No.1 – Smt. Yashmin Fathima. All these appeals have been preferred by Accused Nos.1 to 4 aggrieved by the conviction judgment rendered by the XXI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bengaluru in Spl.C.C.No.187/2000 dated 30.03.2010, praying to allow the appeals and thereby to setaside the conviction judgment and to acquit the appellants of the alleged offences. By the said common judgment, Accused No.1 has been convicted for offences punishable under Sections 120B, 420, 381, 451, 477A and 201 IPC, Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Accused Nos.2 to 4 have been convicted for offences punishable under Sections 120
Ashok Debbarma Alias Achak Debbarma Vs. State Of Tripura
Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. V.K. Sehgal
Chittaranjan Shetty Vs. State by CBI Bangalore
Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar vs. Mohamed Haji Latif and others
K.Devassia vs. State of Kerala
Nanjappa vs. State of Karnataka
Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal and another Vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Haryana vs. N.C.Tandon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.