S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
JMC ATEPL Joint Venture, Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited – Respondent
ORDER :
1. In this petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:
(ii) Appoint a new arbitral tribunal outside the panel of arbitrators maintained by the Respondent, in the matter of the dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent.
(iii) Pass such further orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the fact and circumstances of the present case.”
CONTENTIONS OF THE PETITIONER:
(i) The Petitioner “M/s. JMC-ATEPL Joint Venture” is a joint venture between JMC Projects (India) Ltd., and Arvind Techno Engineers Private Limited. The Respondent-BMRCL is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, as a Government Undertaking and is a joint venture of Government of India and Government of Karnataka and is a Special Purpose Vehicle entrusted with the responsibility of implementation of Bangalore Metro Rail Project.
(ii) It is contended that in the year 2009, the Resp
All India Power Engineer Federation vs. Sasan Power Ltd. (2017) 1 SCC 487
Behari Kunj Sahkari Awas Samiti vs. State of U.P. (1997) 7 SCC 37
BSNL vs. Motorola India (P) Ltd. (2009) 2 SCC 337
Government of Haryana PWD Haryana (B&R) Branch vs. G.F. Toll Road Pvt. Ltd. and Others
HRD Corporation vs. GAIL (India) Ltd. (2018) 12 SCC 471
Roop Chand vs. State of Punjab
Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd. vs. M/s Jain Studios Limited
TRF Limited vs. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd. (2017) 8 SCC 377
Vasu P. Shetty vs. Hotel Vandana Palace
Voestalpine Schienen GMBH vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (2017) 4 SCC 665
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.