SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Kunal Bahl – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The Petitioners in Crl.P. No.4676/2020 are the Directors of Snapdeal Private Limited, accused No.2. They are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
b) Quash the Complaint the Complaint dated 5.6.2020 in C.C.No.156/2020 pending on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CMM, Mysuru; and
c) Quash the order dated 8.6.2020 and further proceedings pending in C.C.No.156/2020 pending before the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CMM, Mysuru taking Cognisance of the offences punishable under Section 27(a)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and issuing Summons to the petitioners.
2. The Petitioner in Crl.P. No.4712/2020 is Snapdeal Private limited who is seeking for the following reliefs:
b) Quash the Complaint the Complaint dated 5.6.2020 in C.C.No.156/2020 pending on the file of the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and CMM, Mysuru; and c) Quash the order dated 8.6.2020 and further proceedings pending in C.C.No.156/2020 pending before the Prl. Sen
GHCL Employees Stock Option Trust v. India Infoline Limited (2013) 4 SCC 505
M/s. Pepsi Foods Ltd and anr. vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and Ors (1998) 5 SCC 749
Bharat Bribe Digumarti v. State (2017) 2 SCC 18
Maksud Saiyed vs. State of Gujarat
Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India
Vijay Dhanka vs. Najima Momtaj
State of Andhra Pradesh vs M. Madhusudhan Rao (2008) 15 SCC 582
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.