K. SOMASHEKAR
Samaja Parivarthana Samudhaya Asha Deep Jayanagar Cross, Sri. S. R. Hiremath – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioner Shri S.R. Hiremath being the Honorary Executive Director of Samaja Parivarthana Samudhaya Asha Deep is the original petitioner before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in W.P (Civil) No.562/2009. A person aggrieved by the action or inaction on the part of the CBI, would naturally be free to ventilate their grievances in an appropriate proceeding before the appropriate forum. Accordingly, the present petitioner has approached this court by filing a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to set aside the order passed by the XLVI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases at Bangalore City (CCH-47) in Spl.C.C.No.116/2012 dated 08.10.2015 discharging Accused No.2/Smt. G. Lakshmi Aruna from the trial and further seeking to direct Accused No.2 to face trial for offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 420, 379, 409, 447, 468, 471, 477-A of IPC and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(c) and (d) of the PC Act, 1988.
2. The factual matrix of the case is, R.C.No.18(A)/2011/CBI/ACB/BLR came to be registered by the first respondent/CBI, Anti Corruption Bureau, Bangalore, in pursuance of the orders passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court of India in
Simranjit Singh Mann v. Union of India
YOGESH @ SACHIN JAGDISH JOSHI VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRAV - (2008) 10 SCC 394
NATIONAL COMMISSION OF WOMEN VS STATE OF DELHI & ANR - (2010) 12 SCC 59
P.S.R. Sadhanantham v. Arunachalm And Another (1980) 3 SCC 141
DALIP SINGH VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS (2010) 2 SCC 114
SUSHILA DEVI VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS (2014) 1 SCC 269
Discharge of accused – Challenged - no active role is incriminated against her, she cannot be made liable for the acts done by Accused No.1. She was only subscribing her signature on the documents on....
Section 239 of Cr.P.C. which postulates “when accused shall be discharged -If, upon considering the police report and the documents sent with it under Section 173 and making such examination, if any,....
The trial judge is expected to exercise judicial mind to determine whether a case for trial has been made out, and the duty of the trial court to apply its mind at the time of framing charges and not....
The offence under Sec. 3 of the PML Act is a stand-alone offence, and the finality of the adjudication proceedings and the discharge of the accused by the trial Court can impact the continuation of c....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.