M.NAGAPRASANNA
Bhuvaneshwari V. Puranik W/o Vinayak Puranik – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms – Respondent
ORDER :
1. “Half the world; and not even half the chance” is the cry of the petitioner in this petition on being denied consideration for appointment on compassionate ground on the death of her father on the score that she is “a married daughter”.
2. Filtering out unnecessary details, the facts that are germane for consideration of the lis are:
3. On the death of the sole breadwinner of the family, petitioner, the daughter of the deceased employee, submitted a representation on 08.11.2016 for grant of appointment on compassionate grounds. In response to the said application of the petitioner, the respondents directed her to rectify the defects in the application and submit the same in a proper format. In terms of the direction, petitioner submitted her representation on 22.05.2017 along with necessary documents.
4. In reply to the request of the petitioner seeking appointment on compassionate grounds, the third respondent Joint Directo
Union Bank of India v. M.T. Latheesh (2006) 7 SCC 350 : 2006 SCC (L&S) 1646
Umesh Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana (1994) 4 SCC 138 : 1994 SCC (L&S) 930 : (1994) 27 ATC 537
State Bank of India v. Somvir Singh reported in (2007) 4 SCC 778
SBI v. Kunti Tiwary SBI v. Kunti Tiwary
Punjab National Bank v. Ashwini Kumar Taneja
SBI v. Somvir Singh SBI v. Somvir Singh
Mumtaz Yunus Mulani v. State of Maharashtra
Union of India v. Shashank Goswami
Canara Bank v. M. Mahesh Kumar
State of H.P. v. Parkash Chand
C.B. Muthamma v. Union of India reported in (1979) 4 SCC 260
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.