M.NAGAPRASANNA
HRUTHIK N. , S/O LATE NINGARAJU K. – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS (ADMINISTRATION) MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU – Respondent
ORDER :
Petitioners in this writ petition call in question the endorsement dated 23-12-2020, bearing No.G1/164168/Anukampa/144/2017-18, declining to grant an appointment on compassionate grounds to the 1st petitioner and have sought for consequential direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the 1st petitioner for an appointment on compassionate grounds qua his qualification.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition, as borne out from the pleadings, are as follows:-
Bhawani Prasad Sonkar v. Union of India [(2011) 4 SCC 209 : (2011) 1 SCC (L&S) 667]
CANARA BANK AND ANOTHER v. M.MAHESH KUMAR
Sushma Gosain v. Union of India [AIR 1989 SC 1976.]
Phoolwati v. Union of India [AIR 1991 SC 469.]
Umesh Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana 1994 (3) JT 525
Umesh Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana [(1994) 4 SCC 138 : 1994 SCC (L&S) 930 : (1994) 27 ATC 537]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.