M. NAGAPRASANNA
KARNATAKA RAJYA MANDAVYA GRUHA NRIMANA SAHAKARA SANGHA SRI VIJAYALAKSHMI BUILDING REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR AND AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SHRI B. SIDDARAJU SON OF SHRI BASAVAIAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MULTISTORIED BUILDING BENGALURU – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioner/Karnataka Rajya Mandavya Gruha Nirmana Sahakara Sangha calls in question a communication dated 13.09.2019 issued by the Mandya Urban Development Authority (‘MUDA’ for short) turning down the application of the petitioner for approval of the layout plan on the score that the lands where the layout is sought to be formed will have to undergo a change of land use in terms of Section 14 of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 (‘the KTCP Act’ for short) and proceedings in terms of Section 14A of the KTCP Act will have to be initiated by the petitioner.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition, as borne out from the pleadings, are as follows:
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS v. GAMDOOR SINGH (1998) 8 SCC 366
PAIARA LAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER (1997) 6 SCC 771
BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY v. BIRLAS UPER BULK TERMINAL
S.N. CHANDRASHEKAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHRS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.