SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 608

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.
Nithya Shambhavananda - Appellant
Vs.
State of Karnataka - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 10076 of 2020 (GM-RES)
Decided On : 09-04-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :C.V. Nagesh, Sr. Counsel for Ajay Kadkol T., Advocate
For the Respondent: V.S. Vinayaka, HCGP

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 114, 120-B, 302, 304, 364, 367, 382, 392 to 400, 402, 436, 449, 459, 460 – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 – Section 82, 82(4), 83, 83(2), 84, 84(4), 204(1), 204(5) – Quash of criminal Proceeding – Offence of Murder – Offense of culpable homicide not amounting to murder – Offense of kidnapping or abducting to commit murder – Offense of kidnapping or abducting in order to subject a person to grievous hurt, slavery, etc – Offense of theft and preparation made for causing death, hurt or restraint in order to the committing of the theft – Offense of robbery – Offense of attempt to commit robbery – Held, In court considered view entire transaction being a fraudulent transaction and therefore, the property could have been attached or brought on sale if procedure under Section 82 Cr.P.C. had been followed by the III Addl. Sessions Judge, Ramanagara before doing so – Court of the considered opinion that orders and are not sustainable and they are not in accordance in law and are therefore, required to be set-aside – Petition is allowed.

ORDER :

SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for certiorari to stay the order dated 5.6.2020 passed in S.C. No. 86/2014 by the III Addl. Sessions Judge, Ramanagara ordering the attachment of the petitioner's property bearing Survey No. 251, Heggadegere village, Bidadi Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk, Bangalore Rural District under Section 83 of the Code of Criminal procedure (Cr.P.C.), confirmed by order dated 29.06.2020 on an application filed by the petitioner under Section 84 of Cr.P.C.

2. FACTS:

2.1. The petitioner claims to have completed his schooling at Lawrence School-Lovedale and is a holder of a graduate degree in Bachelors of Arts-Economics from the Ramakrishna Mutt Vivekananda College, Chennai. He further claims to be a member of a respectable business community identified as "Chettiars - Nagarathars" in the State of Tamil Nadu. The petitioner is a very affluent person belonging to a high Society business family. The petitioner, along with his other family members, is said to own 500 acres of coffee plantations in the region of Coorg, Karnataka, apart from holding 200 acres of agricultural lands in Pudukottai, Tamil Nadu. The petitioner is also stated to own a business establishment engaged in coffee curing activities catering to over more than ten thousand tons of coffee to the markets not only in India but also beyond the boundaries of the country.

2.2. The petitioner allegedly owns and possesses several immovable properties that are situated across the State of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. The petitioner is stated to be involved in philanthropic activities such as providing skill training and employment for the underprivileged, nurturing the educational and social needs, setting up Goshala, distribution of milk and other dairy products free of cost to children and members of economically weaker sections and deserving sections of the society, etc.

2.3. It is contended that one such Goshala Housing more than 300 cows is set up by the petitioner in immovable bearing in Sy. No. 251, Heggadegere village, Bidadi Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk, Bangalore Rural District.

2.4. In S.C. No. 86/2014, which is pending on the file of the III Addl. Sessions Judge, Ramanagara, the said Judge by way of his order dated 5.6.2020 passed under Section 83 of Cr.P.C. is alleged to have called upon the Deputy Commissioner, Ramanagara District to attach the property bearing Sy. No. 251, Heggadegere village, Bidadi Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk, Bangalore Rural District, on the ground that the said property was belonging to one Sheelam Gopal Reddy.

2.5. Sheelam Gopal Reddy is accused No. 2 in the said case, who had remained absent despite issuance of court notice and order of proclamation against him for the purpose of securing his presence in the said case despite the prosecution being fully aware that the attached property belongs to the petitioner.

2.6. It is contended that the aforesaid property came to be vested in the petitioner vide a registered agreement of sale dated 27.6.2018 executed by Sheelam Gopal Reddy, who was the erstwhile owner of the property after receiving a total consideration of Rs. 2,25,75,000/- through his son and Power of Attorney Yasaswi Sheelam Reddy.

2.7. On the date of the agreement, the entire sale consideration except for a meagre sum of Rs. 2,25,000/- which constitutes a minuscule fraction came to be paid by the petitioner to the vendor. Immediately thereafter, i.e., on the very next date of the agreement, the petitioner who is a purchaser of the aforesaid property came to be put in actual physical possession by the vendor of the property by Yasaswi Sheelam Reddy, who is a power of attorney of Sheelam Gopal Reddy and since then the petitioner is stated to be enjoying the property as an absolute owner with the unconditional right, title and interest over the attached property.

2.8. From June 2018 till now the vendor nor anyone else have raised their little finger visa-vis the absolute right, title and exclusiv

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top