IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
M. Nagaprasanna, J.
Mr. Sayyad Mohammad @ Nasim S/o Abdul Aziz - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Karnataka By Economic And Narcotic Crime Police Station Mangalore City - Respondent
Writ Petition No.5934 OF 2022(GM-RES)
Decided On : 29-03-2022
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 167(2), 173(2) – Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Sections 8(c), 20(B)(ii)(c) –– Indian Arms Act, 1959 – Sections 25 and 3 – Quashment of entire proceedings – Whether filing of the charge sheet without FSL report would vitiate the proceedings – Para 10.
Finding of the court: However, where quantitative analysis is requires longer time, results of the qualitative test should be despatched to the officer from whom the samples were received within the aforesaid time limit on original copy of the Test Memo so that court proceedings can start immediately – In results of quantitative test (purity of the drug) should also be indicated on duplicate test memo and sent to the officer from whom the samples were received – Law laid down by the Division Bench of Bombay High Court in circumstance is apposite, as Apex Court in case does not consider fact whether filing of charge sheet without FSL report would vitiate proceedings.
Results: Writ Petition is dismissed.
ORDER :
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question proceedings in Crime No.30 of 2021 registered for offences punishable under Sections 25 and 3 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 8(c), 20(B)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (‘the Act’ for short).
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition, as borne out from the pleadings, are as follows:-
3. Heard the learned senior counsel Sri Hashmath Pasha appearing for the petitioner and Smt.K.P.Yashodha, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
4. The learned senior counsel would submit that the petitioner is entitled to an interim bail as an interim order and later quashment of proceedings on one solitary ground viz., the charge sheet filed by the Police purportedly after investigation on 20-11-2021 is a defective charge sheet or an incomplete charge sheet, as the contraband substance has been sent for its test to the Forensic Science Laboratory and the report is yet to come. In the absence of the report, the substance that was seized is unidentifiable and, therefore, becomes a defective charge sheet. The Police have hurriedly filed an incomplete charge sheet only to get over the rigour of default bail under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C. He would submit that filing of the final report being in violation of Section 173(2) of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner is entitled to be released forthwith on bail. In support of his submissions, he would place reliance upon the judgments in the cases of:
(ii) NOOR AGA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER and
(iii) CHANDRU KUNTHUR RAGHUVEGOWDA v. STATE BY INSPECTOR OF CUSTOMS CIU, BENGALURU.
5. On the other hand, the learned High Court Government Pleader would vehemently refute the submissions of the learned senior counsel and submit that mere non-filing of FSL report will not vitiate the charge sheet that is filed, as it can always be filed in the proceedings subsequently. Since contraband substance being Ganja it can be easily identifiable by structure and smell and FSL report is only a formality. She would place reliance upon a Division Bench judgment of the Bombay High Court in the case of MANAS KRISHNA T.K. v. STATE and the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of SUPERINTENDENT, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, CHENNAI v. R.PAULSAMY, (2000) 9 SCC 549.
6. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned senior counsel and the learned High Court Government Pleader and perused the material on record. In furtherance whereof, the only issue that falls for my consideration is,
Superintendent, Narcotics Control Bureau, Chennai v. R.Paulsamy
State of Maharashtra v. Sharadchandra Vinayak Dongre
Jagdish Purohit v. State of Maharashtra
UNION OF INDIA v. BAL MUKUND AND OTHERS
NOOR AGA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.