SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Ravindra T. S/o Late Thimmappa – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka by its Secretary Department of Housing & Urban Development, Vikasa Soudha Bangalor – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
b. Issue an appropriate writ or order declaring that in view of Section 27 of the Bangalore Development Authority Act 1976, Section 36 of the said Act is inapplicable much less by virtue of Section 24[2] of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 [Central Act No. 30 of 2013] the acquisition is deemed to have been passed even as against the respondent State is concerned.
c. Issue an appropriate writ or order directing the respondents not to meddle with the property right of the petitioners except in accordance w
Sri. R. Adhikesavulu Naidu & Others vs. The State of Karnataka reported in 2011 ILR(KAR) 3657
Meenakshi Thimmaiah vs. State of Karnataka reported in 2010 ILR(KAR) 62
Babu Vergheese v. Kerala State Bar Council [(1999) 3 SCC 422 : AIR 1999 SC 1281.]
State of Rajasthan vs. D.R.Laxmi reported in 1996 (6) SCC 445
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.