SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Kar) 930

H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
K. Nagaraj – Appellant
Versus
P. N. Lingesh Babu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri Ashok K.L.
For the Respondent: Sri P.N. Lingesh Babu.

ORDER :

The petitioner who was the accused in the Court of learned III Addl. Senior Civil Judge & JMFC at Davanagere (hereinafter referred to as 'the Trial Court1) in CC. No.2405/2009 (old CC No.257/2008), was found guilty for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as 'the N.I. Act') and accordingly was convicted by Judgment dated 21.11.2012.

2. The summary of the case of the complainant in the Trial Court is that the accused who was acquainted with him had borrowed a loan of Rs.80,000/- from him in the first week of January, 2006, agreeing to repay the same with interest at the rate of 2% per month. Since the accused did not repay the loan amount, at the specific demand made by the complainant for the repayment of the loan amount, the accused issued a cheque bearing No.059240 dated 18.02.2007 drawn on Corporation Bank, Mandipet Branch, Davanagere, for a sum of Rs.80,000/- in favour of the complainant. When the said cheque was presented by the complainant for its realisation, the same came to be dishonoured with the banker's shara 'insufficient funds'. Thereafter the complainant got issued a legal notice

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top