Back
RITU RAJ AWASTHI, SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
CHANDRAHASA BHANDARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The captioned appeal is filed assailing the correctness of the order dated 6.2.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.50200-50205/2014.
2. The facts leading to the case are as under:
Kumki rights are not absolute and can be curtailed for public interest under Section 79(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.
Point of law: Every appeal preferred after expiry of period specified in Sec. 5-A, of Act shall be accompanied by a separate application for condonation of delay supported by an affidavit sworn to by....
The court affirmed that Jamma Malai tenure is a limited but transferable property right, not a lease, and previous judicial decisions dictate the rights of the parties involved.
The authority to cancel mutation orders is quasi-judicial and must be exercised in accordance with the principles of natural justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the cancellation of a mutation must adhere to the principles of natural justice and statutory provisions, and the authority reviewing the muta....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
