R. NATARAJ
JAYAMMA – Appellant
Versus
RATHNAMMA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R. Nataraj, J.
1. These Revision Petitions are filed by the defendant No. 7 in O.S.No. 2791/2010 pending trial before the IX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (henceforth referred as 'Trial Court') challenging an order dtd. 12/2/2016, by which an application filed under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) of CPC was rejected.
2. A suit in O.S.No. 2791/2010 was filed for partition and separation possession of the undivided right title and interest of the plaintiff in suit schedule property. The suit was contested by defendant No. 7, who also filed an application under Order VII Rule (a) and (d) of CPC to reject the plaint.
3. Defendant No. 7 contended in the application that the suit property was purchased by Melappa the grandfather of the plaintiff in terms of the sale deed dtd. 1/3/1946 and that defendant No. 1 was his only son, who succeeded to the property. Thus, it was contended that the said property was the absolute property of defendant No. 1. It is claimed that defendant No. 1 had executed an agreement of sale in favour of defendant No. 7. After a partition between the family members, the defendant Nos.2 and 3 had executed a sale deed dtd. 23/3/2006 in fav
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.