SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 304

JYOTI MULIMANI
Parvathamma – Appellant
Versus
PCL. CF. Conservator of Forests – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Shivananda D.S., Advocate, V.S.Naik, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. Sri.V.S.Naik, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri.Shivananda D.S., learned AGA for respondents, have appeared in-person.

2. In this writ petition, petitioner has assailed the order passed by the third respondent at Annexure-A, dtd. 28/1/2015 in case No [xxx xxx xxx] -8/14-15 and the order dtd. 28/8/2015 vide Ref.No. [xxx xxx xxx] 8/14-15 at Annexure-'D'.

3. The facts of the case are stated as under :-

    It is stated that the petitioner was working under the second respondent as a Watcher. The petitioner's husband Sri.Krishne Gowda was also working as a Watcher. Both of them were working continuously. It is stated that the second respondent did not pay the wages to the petitioner with effect from 21/1/2012 onwards. Similarly, petitioner's husband Sri.Krishne Gowda was also denied wages from 3/4/2012 onwards. Both of them were requesting the second respondent to pay them the wages regularly and the request was not considered by the second respondent.

It is also averred that the petitioner was due in a sum of Rs.78,708.00 (Rupees Seventy-Eight Thousand Seven Hundred and eight only) towards wages from January 2012 to 28/2/2013 at the rate of Rs.5622.14 (Rupees Five Thousand S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top