SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 271

K.NATARAJAN
ASADULLA KHAN – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
P. Prasanna Kumar, S.G. Bhagavan.

JUDGMENT :

1. This petition is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.1, 2 and 4 under Sec. 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the criminal proceedings in Special C.C.No. 36/2013 pending on the file of Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru and Special Judge (CCH-1), Bengaluru for the offence punishable under Sec. 3 punishable under Sec. 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short 'PML' Act).

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned special counsel for the respondent.

3. The case of the prosecution before the trial Court is that the Deputy Director of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has filed a complaint in ECIR No. 87/BZ/2010 before the Special Court under Ss. 43 and 44 of the PML Act by way of PCR No. 13/2013 alleging that the petitioner-company is said to have laundering money has committed the offence as per Sec. 3 of the PML Act punishable under Sec. 4 of the PML Act read with Ss. 120B, 420 of IPC, Ss. 13(2) read with Sec. 131 D of the P.C. Act. The same is challenged before this Court by the petitioners-accused Nos.1, 2 and 4.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners mainly contested the matter challenging the taking cognizance by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top