IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
Suraj Govindaraj, J.
Sri. Narayana B. S/o L.T. Bettegowda - Petitioners
Versus
State Of Karnataka - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 8524 Of 2019 (GM-RES)
Decided On : 23-09-2022
Property - Fake Surety/Security Created - Anticipatory Bail - Though no relief can be granted to petitioner as such, issue raised by Petitioner being of general importance, it would be required of this court to issue certain general directions - Above matter having arisen out of a fake surety which had been created on property of petitioner and said property having been brought to sale on account of default by accused in criminal matter, it is only then that petitioner came to know of fake surety/security created on his property.
Finding of the Court: Learned AGA has been unable to point out safeguards which are built in, in respect of collection of sureties except to state that any person could furnish photocopies of documents to value fixed by Court while granting a bail, anticipatory bail or passing any such order and said document would be taken on record as security – Court is of considered opinion that same is not sufficient enough a safeguard like that evidenced in present case where property belonging to a third party was provided as a surety - Several reports which have been filed indicate that this is not a stray occurrence, and that this kind of situation was arisen on several occasions which has also resulted in investigation and prosecution - In view of the above, Court is of considered opinion that unless effective steps are taken, innocent third parties could be put to great risk unwittingly and unknowingly - Hence, Court is of considered opinion that whenever any surety is furnished for a release of an accused on bail.
Result: Petition disposed of.
ORDER :
1. Sri. Venkatesh P. Dalwai, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has expired and there is none to prosecute the above matter.
2. His submission is placed on record.
3. Though no relief can be granted to the petitioner as such, the issue raised by the Petitioner being of general importance, it would be required of this court to issue certain general directions.
4. The above matter having arisen out of a fake surety which had been created on the property of the petitioner and the said property having been brought to sale on account of default by the accused in the criminal matter, it is only then that the petitioner came to know of the fake surety/security created on his property.
5. The learned AGA has been unable to point out the safeguards which are built in, in respect of collection of sureties except to state that any person could furnish photocopies of the documents to the value fixed by the Court while granting a bail, anticipatory bail or passing any such order and the said document would be taken on record as security.
6. I am of the considered opinion that the same is not sufficient enough a safeguard like that evidenced in the present case where the property belonging to a third party was provided as a surety. The several reports which have been filed indicate that this is not a stray occurrence, and that this kind of situation was arisen on several occasions which has also resulted in investigation and prosecution.
7. In view of the above, I am of the considered opinion that unless effective steps are taken, innocent third parties could be put to great risk unwittingly and unknowingly. Hence, I am of the considered opinion that whenever any surety is furnished for a release of an accused on bail, the following steps shall be followed:
7.2. The issuing authority should obtain the photograph, signature or clear Thumb Impression of the surety on the solvency certificate and attest the same.
7.3. The certificate to also be accompanied by a self attested copy of the Aadhar card of the surety.
7.4. The Employees who stand, as sureties shall be directed to produce a certificate of Identity and Salary from their Employer. It should contain the signature of the Employee duly attested by the Employer.
7.5. At the time of accepting the surety the signature/Thumb Impression of the surety be obtained on the solvency certificate or salary certificate to satisfy that the solvency or salary certificate relates to the surety present in the court along with a photograph.
7.6. Each surety shall furnish his full name, father's name, age, occupation, and complete postal address to the court.
7.7. The sureties shall produce Bank Pass Books or Ration Cards. Aadhar Card or some other form of identity cards to establish their identity with reference to the particulars of the solvency certificate.
7.8. If surety is provided in the form of property, the details of the property to be cross checked by the concerned ministerial officer from the web-site of the revenue department, by using the BHOOMI or KAVERI software as may be required.
7.9. The Principal Secretary Revenue Department to make arrangement for providing of necessary training to all concerned as regards such verification. The Registrar (General), High Court of Karnataka is directed to coordinate with the Principal Secretary Revenue Department for doing needful.
7.10. The UIDAI to provide and equip all courts with necessary equipment and software to authenticate the identity of the surety using the Aadhar card.
7.11. In case of cash security the court shall satisfy that the accused has a permanent address and fixed abode and his presence can be easily secured, copies of Aadhar Card, Ration Card, Election ID etc., of the Accused to be collected.
7.12. The names
The discretion of the court in accepting the same set of sureties in multiple cases and the emphasis on the competency and reliability of sureties.
The court emphasized that bail conditions should be reasonable and take into account the individual circumstances of the accused, particularly when the accused faces difficulty in meeting certain req....
Point of Law : Surety Bond - surety bond is a contract and it is a question as to how far its terms can be considered to have been varied by any unilateral act. Each bond, it may be pointed out, has....
Victims in criminal proceedings have the right to access documents necessary to verify the authenticity of sureties provided in bail applications, as part of their participatory rights under the law.
Trial courts must assess the socioeconomic conditions of a prisoner when determining bail surety requirements, ensuring that conditions are not onerous or arbitrary, which could unjustly prevent rele....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.