IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV, UMESH M. ADIGA, JJ.
Shri Suresh, S/o. Annasaheb Udagave & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Secretary Department of Urban Development & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Appeal No. 100196 of 2022 [LB-RES]
Decided On : 02-12-2022
Karnataka Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1987 - Section 4(2)(iii) - Elections - Post of ‘Adhyaksha’ and ‘Upadhyaksha’- Petitioners are Councilors of Town Municipal Council, Sadalaga and were elected in Elections held in year and were official candidates of Bharatiya Janata Party (B.J.P.) - In Elections held for post of ‘Adhyaksha’ and ‘Upadhyaksha’, Petitioner No.1 had contested for post of ‘Adhyaksha’ and was elected and petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 had cast their votes in favour of petitioner No.1 - It is stated that President of Bharatiya Janata Party, Chikkodi Lok Sabha Constituency had lodged a complaint before Deputy Commissioner, alleging that despite issuance of Whip to Members to vote for official candidate for post of ‘President’ and for post of ‘Vice President’ as regards official candidate, petitioners had violated Whip in not voting for official Party candidates and had requested for initiation of proceedings under Act - It is further made out from facts that had filed a complaint before Chief Executive Officer (CEO), TMC raising similar contentions as made by President of B.J.P. referred to above, which was received by CEO, TMC - It is further submitted that another complaint is stated to have been filed with similar contents by President of B.J.P. Chikkodi Lok Sabha Constituency.
Finding of Court : Though petitioners have specifically asserted in their memo dated that they would not be in a position to file objections if specified documents are not furnished, objections are filed and thereafter memo is filed submitting that the objection statement and evidence may be treated as arguments - Nowhere there is a whisper regarding non-furnishing of documents as on date of filing their statement of objections, nor is there any written request seeking for affording an opportunity of cross-examining specific witnesses - In a summary enquiry, unless a request is made specifically seeking right to cross-examine, Enquiring Authority is not obliged to afford such opportunity - In passing, it would be necessary to observe that though legally no ground is made out in present case relating to violation of principles of natural justice, nevertheless, quasi-judicial authorities ought to function in a manner that confidence of litigants in such authorities is retained by following transparent functioning procedures so as to dispel commonly held notion that quasi-judicial authorities act at dictates of political Party in power, more so, in enquiries relating to disqualification. [Para 38 and 40]
Result : Writ Appeal is dismissed
JUDGMENT :
The appellants have called in question the validity of the order of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P.No.105239/2021 [LB-RES] disposed off on 21.04.2022, whereby the petition filed challenging the order of 28.10.2021 disqualifying the appellants from the membership of Sadalaga Town Municipal Council, passed under Section 4(2)(iii) of the Karnataka Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1987 [‘the Act’ for brevity], was dismissed.
2. The parties are referred as per their rank in the writ proceedings for the purpose of convenience.
3. The petitioners are Councilors of the Town Municipal Council, Sadalaga and were elected in the Elections held in the year 2018 and were official candidates of Bharatiya Janata Party (B.J.P.). In the Elections held for the post of ‘Adhyaksha’ and ‘Upadhyaksha’ on 02.11.2020, petitioner No.1 had contested for the post of ‘Adhyaksha’ and was elected and petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 had cast their votes in favour of petitioner No.1.
4. On 03.11.2020, it is stated that the President of Bharatiya Janata Party, Chikkodi Lok Sabha Constituency had lodged a complaint before the Deputy Commissioner, alleging that despite issuance of Whip to the Members to vote for the official candidate for the post of ‘President’ Sri Anand Devagouda Patil and for the post of ‘Vice President’ as regards the official candidate Sri Basavaraj Shankara Hanabar, the petitioners had violated the Whip in not voting for the official Party candidates and had requested for initiation of proceedings under the Act.
5. It is further made out from the facts that Sri Anand Devagouda Patil had filed a complaint before the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), TMC raising similar contentions as made by the President of B.J.P. referred to above, which was received by the CEO, TMC, on 04.11.2020. It is further submitted that another complaint is stated to have been filed on 07.11.2020 with similar contents by the President of B.J.P. Chikkodi Lok Sabha Constituency.
6. Initially, the petitioners had challenged the validity of the disqualification proceedings in W.P.No.148736/2020 and against refusal to grant interim order to stay the proceedings of disqualification, Writ Appeal came to be filed in W.P.No.100136/2021, which was disposed off by judgment dated 28.07.2021 with the following observations :
21. With the above observations, the Writ Appeal is disposed off. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits and demerits of the case. It is for the Deputy Commissioner to decide the same in accordance with law, after providing sufficient opportunity to both the parties and pass appropriate orders within the time stipulated under law. All the contentions of both the parties are left open to be urged before the Deputy Commissioner.”
7. Subsequently the proceedings came to be resumed by the Deputy Commissioner and upon conclusion of proceedings, order came to be passed on 28.10.2021 allowing the petition and disqualifying the petitioners from membership of Sadalaga Town Municipal Council. As against such order pass
Point of Law : Principle that justice must not only be done but it must eminently appear to be done as well is equally applicable to quasi-judicial proceeding if such a proceeding has to inspire con....
Election - Disqualification on ground of defection - Petitioner has violated the whip and invited the impugned order. Violation alleged in terms of Section 4 with regard to 24 hours as held by this C....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for clear communication of the direction issued by a political party to its councilors to invoke the provisions of the Karnataka Lo....
Decisions impacting rights of elected representatives must adhere to natural justice, including providing notice and opportunity for hearing.
High Court in exercising the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was totally erroneous.
Only a member, councillor, or political party can file a complaint regarding disqualification on the ground of defection under Section 4 of the Karnataka Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) ....
There can be many inferences for voluntarily giving up the membership even if one has not resigned; the case at hand is one where the petitioners have all resigned, therefore, no inference need be dr....
Service of a political party whip is deemed effective under the General Clauses Act when properly addressed and posted, presuming the recipient's awareness of its contents.
Point of Law- In exercise of discretionary power of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court might interfere with administrative matters only if the decision is violative....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.