IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
P. Krishna Bhat, J.
B. Srinivas Rao & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Bangalore Development Authority & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 51982 of 2015 (GM-RES
Decided On : 16-03-2022
Mandamus - Recovery of Possession - Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Section 70, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Section 38-B
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, claiming to be owners of house sites in a layout formed by respondent No.4-Society, sought a writ of mandamus to recover possession of specific sites from unauthorized occupants. Respondent No.1-Bangalore Development Authority (BDa) contended that the petitioners should seek redressal under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, as the Society had formed the layout. BDa also claimed to have made bulk allotment under Section 38-B of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the dispute involved determining disputed questions of facts and should be adjudicated by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. The court dismissed the writ petition, allowing the petitioners to seek relief from the Registrar of Co-operative Societies or any other forum available under the law.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to recover possession of the house sites from unauthorized occupants, and if the dispute fell under the purview of Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the dispute involved determining disputed questions of facts and should be adjudicated by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioners to seek relief from the Registrar of Co-operative Societies or any other forum available under the law.
JUDGMENT
P. Krishna Bhat, J. - The petitioners claiming to be owners of house sites in the layout formed by respondent No.4-Society have approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:
a. a writ of mandamus or a writ or order or direction of appropriate nature directing the respondents to initiate action to recover possession in respect of 4 sites referred to above from the persons in unauthorized occupation with a direction to put the petitioners in possession after taking possession.
b. xxx xxx
c. Direct the respondents to put the petitioner No.1 in possession of
[i] site Nos.3270 and 3271 carved in Survey Nos.16 to 19 of Gerehally and Survey Nos.103/1, 103/2, 104/2, 105 and 106 of Hosakerehally Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk by Vishwabharathi House Building Co-operative Society Ltd., in IV phase of Girinagar, Bangalore-560 085, bounded on the east by: road, west by: portion of site Nos.3309 and 3308, north by: site No.3269 and south by: site No.3272 measuring 40' x 40', all measuring 1600 sq. ft., after evicting the person in unauthorized occupation.
[ii] direct the respondents to put the petitioner No.2 in possession of site No.3269 carved in Survey Nos.16 to 19 of Gerehally and Survey Nos.103/1, 103/2, 104/2, 105 and 106 of Hosakerehally Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk by Vishwabharathi House Building Co-operative Society Ltd., in IV phase of Girinagar, Bangalore-560 085, bounded on the east by: road, west by: portion of site Nos.3309 and 3310, north by: site No.3268 and south by: site No.3270, measuring 40' x 20', all measuring 800 sq. ft., after evicting the person in unauthorized occupation.
[iii] direct the respondents to put the petitioner No.3 in possession of site No.3282 carved in Survey Nos.16 to 19 of Gerehally and Survey Nos.103/1, 103/2, 104/2, 105 and 106 of Hosakerehally Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk by Vishwabharathi House Building Co-operative Society Ltd., in IV phase of Girinagar, Bangalore-560 085, bounded on the east by: road, west by: site No.3301, north by: site No.3281 and south by: site No.3283 measuring 40' x 20', all measuring 800 sq. ft., after evicting the person in unauthorized occupation.
2. Petitioner No.1 claims that he has purchased site Nos.3270 and 3271, petitioner No.2 claims that she has purchased site No.3269 and petitioner No.3 claims that he has purchased site No.3282 in the said layout. They further averred that in spite of specific direction issued by a learned Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.18496 of 2007 (La-BDa) and connected matters disposed of 16-11-2010 (annexure-D), the respondents have not cleared the encroachment and unauthorised occupants and handed over the vacant possession of house sites to the petitioners and thereby, they have failed in discharging their duties.
3. In support of their prayers, the petitioners have also produced title deeds as per annexures-a, B and C.
4. Respondent No.1-Bangalore Development authority (for short, 'BDa') has filed its detailed statement of objections. It has contended that the petitioners are claiming that they are the members of respondent No.4-Society. The Society has formed the layout and therefore, the petitioners should seek their redressal under Section 70 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies act, 1959. Respondent No.1 has stated that respondent No.4-Society has allotted the same sites to different persons and such persons are already in possession of the house sites and they have constructed houses therein, after obtaining sale deeds from the Society. It has also stated that BDa has issued acquisition notification to acquire the land in Survey Nos.16 to 19 of Gerehally and Survey Nos.103/1, 103/2, 104/2, 105 and 106 of Hosakerehalli Village along with certain other lands for the purpose of formation of Banashakari 3rd Stage layout as per preliminary no
The main legal point established in the judgment is that disputes involving determination of disputed questions of facts should be adjudicated by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies under Section....
Authority under Section 70 enables the Additional Registrar to cancel improper allotments and registered sale deeds within cooperative societies, reinforcing adherence to bylaws and judicial oversigh....
Section 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, Civil Court is vested jurisdiction to adjudicate all suits of civil nature. Exclusion of jurisdiction of Civil Court to adjudicate suit of civil nature is an exc....
The absence of a registered conveyance deed precludes the Society from claiming any rights to the plot, and principles of res judicata apply to prevent re-litigation of the same issues.
The judgment clarified the scope of jurisdiction under Section 70 of the Act, emphasizing that the dispute must relate to the constitution, management, or business of a co-operative society and invol....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.