Ravi Kumar T. N vs State of Karnataka

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Kar) 826

V. SRISHANANDA
Ravi Kumar T. N – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Shankar G, Advocate, Rahul Rai K, Advocate

JUDGMENT

V. Srishananda, J. - Heard Sri.Shankar G., the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Rahul Rai K., learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State.

2. The present petition is filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail for the petitioners in the event of their arrest in Crime No.379/2021 of Hoskote Police Station, Bengaluru for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 120(B) read with Section 34 of IPC.

3. Brief facts of the case are as under:

a complaint came to be lodged by Sri Ramanjaneya S/o late Chinnappa. In the complaint, it is contended that the complainant is the resident of Tavarekere Village, Nandagudi Hobli, Hosakote Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District wanted to purchase the land bearing Sy.No.47 to the extent of 6 acres 19 guntas and in that regard, one T.L.Manjunath S/o. Lakshmaiah shown interest and petitioners have received a sum of Rs.50,00,000/- and thereafter, failed to execute the sale deed. Despite repeated demands, the petitioners and others failed to execute the sale deed and in that regard, the complainant met Sri T.M.Nagaraju, who said that the revenue entries in respect of the land is not mutated and therefore, so

Click Here to Read the rest of this document