JYOTI MULIMANI
Surrayya Parveen @ Annapoorna – Appellant
Versus
Labour Officer Cum – Respondent
ORDER
1. Sri.Javeed.S, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri.Raghuveer, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Smt.Ananya Y.V, for respondent-2, have appeared through video conferencing.
Sri.Shivananda D.S. learned AGA for respondent-1 has appeared in-person.
2. The brief facts of the case are stated as under:-
It is stated that the petitioner was working in M/s.R.S.Nursing Home from June 1994 as Aya till 02.03.2008 with due diligently, honestly and immaculately. But the respondents refused the service of the petitioner w.e.f. 02.03.2008 onwards.
It is averred that during the course of her employment, she was paid lesser wages than the minimum wages fixed to the category post of Aya. When queried, the Officials of Nursing Home used to give verbal assurance of payment. It is said that even after refusal of her employment, they went on giving false assurance but did not pay any amount.
Hence, petitioner filed a claim application before the Labour Commissioner cum Minimum Wages Enquiry Officer, in M.W.A.No.48/2008 with a prayer to direct the Nursing Home - the second respondent to pay the difference amount of Rs. 1,28,648.52/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Eight Thousand Six Hundred and Forty Eight
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.