SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1221

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH AT DHARWAD
Shivashankar Amarannavar, J.
Bhimappa - Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 100436 of 2022
Decided On : 13-10-2022

Advocates appeared:
Srinand A. Pachhapure, Adv., for the Appellant; Prashanth V. Mogali, HCGP., for the Respondents

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the decision to grant bail to an accused, even in cases involving heinous offences, should be based on a careful consideration of the grounds and potential conditions to ensure the safety of the complainant and other witnesses.

Headnote:

Bail - Criminal Conspiracy - Murder - SC & ST Act - [BAIL] - [Criminal Conspiracy and Murder] - [The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439, The Indian Penal Code - Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 120B, 302, 341, 363, 201, 149, Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(2)(V) & (Va)] - The court allowed the bail petition of accused No. 1, who was charged with criminal conspiracy and murder under various sections of the IPC and the SC & ST Act, based on the grounds that there were valid reasons to set aside the lower court's order and grant bail, subject to certain conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the murder of a man who was alleged to have developed an illicit relationship with the second wife of accused No. 1. The accused, along with others, conspired to kill the deceased and disposed of his body in a canal.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there were valid grounds for setting aside the lower court's order and granting bail to accused No. 1, subject to certain terms and conditions.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the validity of the grounds for granting bail to accused No. 1, considering the heinous nature of the alleged offences and the potential threat to the complainant and other prosecution witnesses.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the delay in conducting the Test Identification parade and the possibility of the accused being taken for investigation and produced in court before the parade. It also addressed the apprehension of the prosecution regarding the potential threat posed by the accused to the complainant and other witnesses.

Final Decision: The criminal appeal was allowed, the lower court's order was set aside, and the bail petition of accused No. 1 was granted, subject to specified conditions.

JUDGMENT

Shivashankar Amarannavar, J. - This appeal is filed by accused No. 1 challenging the order dated 15.3.2022 passed by the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 144/2022 filed under Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Cr.P.C.', for brevity) seeking bail in respect of Raibag Police Station Crime No. 296/2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 120B, 302, 341, 363 and 201 read with Section 149 of The Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the 'IPC', for brevity) and Section 3(2)(V) & (Va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'SC & ST Act', for brevity).

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant/accused No. 1 and the learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent No. 1/State. Respondent No. 2/complainant in spite of service of notice has remained absent and unrepresented.

3. The case of the prosecution is that, one Smt. Savita W/o. Arjun Megade has filed complaint against four unknown persons stating that accused No. 1/Bhimappa is a resident of Gosabal Village of Gokak Taluk, he is a mason by occupation, he has two wives namely Laxmi and Bharati. The first wife has two children and second wife has a son. Accused No. 1 along with two wives and children was staying separately in a rented house in Bendawad Village at about four years ago. At that time the deceased Arjun Maruti Megade of same Bendawad Village has developed an illicit relationship with Bharati the second wife of accused No. 1. Accused No. 1 returned home so early from work whereby he saw the deceased Arjun and his wife together in the house. He tried to catch the deceased but he fled away from the spot. When the villagers of Bendawad became aware of such illicit relationship, accused No. 1 has left the said Village and began to stay with his family in Gosabal Village. But, the deceased Arjun began stalking accused No. 1's wife (Bharati) in Gosabal Village also. As a result, accused No. 1 became enraged and he made a criminal conspiracy with accused Nos. 2 to 6 to eliminate the said Arjun. That on 03.12.2021 at about 11:00 a.m. when the said deceased Arjun who was a milk vendor was proceeding on a two wheeler bearing Registration No. KA-23/EM-4791 from Katakabhavi to Mantur. The accused Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 have intercepted him near the land of Govindrao Appasaheb Desai on Mantur-Katakabhavi tar road within the limits of Mantur Village and amongst them, the accused No. 1 heavily assaulted on the head of the said Arjun with iron rod and when the said Arjun lost his consciousness and collapsed, the said accused carried him in a TATA Indigo car bearing Reg. No. KA-48/M-1286. It is on the way the said Arjun succumbed to the injuries in the car itself. The said accused Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 threw his body in a big water canal near Mahanteshwar Math in Mannikeri Village. As per the plan hatched by them, the accused No. 3 who is relative of accused No. 1 and resident of Bendawad Village was giving information about the movements and location of the deceased Arjun and accused No. 6 was standing near the big canal in Mannikeri watching the public to ensure that nobody should be there at the time of throwing the dead body in the said canal. The deceased Arjun belongs to Hindu Madar caste and accused Nos. 1, 5 and 6 belong to Hindu Lingayat, accused No. 2 belongs to Hindu Kshatriya and accused No. 4 is Hindu Waddar by caste. It is alleged that accused Nos. 1 to 6 have committed the murder of Arjun Megade as he developed illicit relationship with the second wife of accused No. 1. The said case came to be registered in Crime No. 296/2021 of Raibag Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 363 read with Section 34 of IPC against the unknown persons. During the course of investigation, Police arrested accused Nos. 1, 4 and 6

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top