SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P. Sandesh, J.
Shaheen Sulthan Taj - Appellant
Versus
State & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Petition No. 7815 of 2022
Decided On : 26-09-2022

Advocates appeared:
Syed Akbar Pasha, Vinayak V.S., for the Appearing Party

Exercise of discretion in favor of the petitioner based on completion of investigation and the need to prove allegations during the trial.

Headnote:

Successive Bail Petition - Sexual Offences - The court allowed the petitioner's successive bail petition in connection with a case involving offences punishable under Sections 370 and 506 of IPC, subject to certain conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, who is the mother of the victim girl, filed a successive bail petition after a previous petition was rejected. The allegations involved subjecting the victim to sexual acts at a young age, with a belated complaint filed in 2022.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the petition and granted bail to the petitioner, considering the completion of the investigation and the need to prove the allegations during the trial.

Issues: Allegations of sexual offences, belated complaint, completion of investigation, and exercise of discretion in favor of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court exercised discretion in favor of the petitioner, considering the completion of the investigation and the need to prove the allegations during the trial.

Final Decision: The petition is allowed, and the petitioner/accused shall be released on bail in connection with the case, subject to specified conditions.

JUDGMENT

H.P. Sandesh, J. - Heard the petitioner counsel and also the learned counsel for the State.

2. This is a successive bail petition filed by the petitioner who is the mother of the victim girl and also this petitioner has filed Criminal Petition No.4906/2022 and this Court vide order dated 14.07.2022 rejected the petition with liberty to approach the Court after filing of the charge-sheet.

3. Now the police have investigated the matter and filed the charge-sheet and the allegation in the complaint is that, when the victim girl was 14 years old in the year 2008, her mother asked her to accompany with a person and be kind to him and also it is an allegation that the said person came and took the complainant to unknown place and subjected her for sexual act and after three years, again, the complainant was sent to Pune and there also she was subjected for sexual act for ten days and she was brought back to the home and in spite of resistance from the complainant, again she was sent to Mumbai in the year 2013-14, there the police have conducted the raid and a case was registered against the petitioner, and the complainant was sent to Vidyaranya Home NGO Institution and having taken note of the history given subjecting the minor girl at the age of 14 years in the year 2008 and subsequently also she was subjected to sexual act at the instance of the petitioner and a belated complaint is filed in the year 2022 i.e. on 23.02.2022 and also it is the contention that some dispute was arisen between the complainant and the petitioner with regard to the property and when the investigation has been completed, it is appropriate to exercise the discretion in favour of the petitioner and the allegation has to be proved during the course of trial.

4. In view of the discussions made above, I pass the following:

ORDER

5. The petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioner/accused shall be released on bail in connection with Crime No.37/2022 (SC No.1148/2022) of Govindapura Police Station, Bengaluru, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 370 and 506 of IPC, subject to the following conditions:

      (i) The petitioner/accused shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-(Rupees two lakhs only) with two sureties for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

      (ii) The petitioner/accused shall not indulge in tampering the prosecution witnesses.

      (iii) The petitioner/accused shall appear before the jurisdictional Court on all the future hearing dates, unless exempted by the Court for any genuine cause.

      (iv) The petitioner/accused shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without prior permission of the Court till the case registered against him is disposed of.

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top