SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1050

K. NATARAJAN
Lakshminarasimha Murthy – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ravi B. Naik, Advocte for Vijetha R. Naik, Advocate, for the Petitioner; R.D. Renukaradhya, HCGP, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

K. Natarajan, J. - This petition is filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for granting regular bail in Crime No. 55/2022 registered by Tumkuru Women Police Station, Tumkuru District, for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 506 of IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012('POCSO Act' for short).

2. Heard the arguments of the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State. The respondent No. 2 is also represented by the learned High Court Government Pleader.

3. The case of the prosecution is that respondent No. 2 Hanumantharayappa, filed a complaint with the police on 05.05.2022, alleging that his niece victim girl aged about 15 years is residing with him in his house where his father is also residing. The parents of the victim girl died about eight years back and she is studying in IX standard. About 15 days prior to the filing of the complaint, he had been to his wife's native place and when he came back, the victim was not found in the house. On enquiry, he came to know that she was in the grandmother's house. Thereafter, he went

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top