KRISHNA S.DIXIT
Stewart Bradley Miciotto – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Krishna S. Dixit, J. - Petitioners are knocking at the doors of Writ Court seeking an order for appointing them jointly or severally as the legal guardians of Smt.Veena Thimmaya W/o second petitioner herein who is stated to be completely disabled on account of certain diseases.
2. The first respondent-State is represented by the learned AGA; second respondent-Union of India is represented by the learned CGC and the third respondent-State Legal Services Authority on request is represented by it's member Sri.Sridhar Prabhu; all they have appreciably assisted in the adjudication of lis brought before the Court.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the Petition Papers, this Court is of the view that this case need not be kept pending any longer regard being had to eminent urgency involved and the availability of the alternate machinery for the redressal. The first respondent-Government of Karnataka has issued a Notification dated 15.12.2021, which reads as under:
Rule-6(9) The Designated authority at the District Level.
(d) The Deputy Commissioner-Chairperson
(e) Five Persons drawn from the State Institutes each of the five groups of disabilities u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.