IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
P.N.Desai, J.
Hajipasha - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 200392/2022 C/W Criminal Petition No. 200903/2022
Decided On : 02-08-2022
NDPS Act - Bail - Sec. 439 of Cr.P.C. - Ss. 20 (b) (ii) (C) and 25 of NDPS Act
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners were accused of illegally transporting 592 kgs of Ganja and were seeking bail. The prosecution alleged their involvement in the illegal transportation and selling of Ganja.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Ganja seized was not dry as claimed by the prosecution, and the petitioners had no previous allegations of such activities. Considering the nature of the offence and the petitioners' character, the Court granted bail under certain conditions.
Issues: Nature and seriousness of the offence, character of the accused, and reasonable probabilities of the accused not being secured at trial.
Ratio Decidendi: Bail is a rule and rejection is an exception. The Court must consider the nature of the offence, character of the accused, and reasonable probabilities of the accused not being secured at trial when granting or rejecting bail.
Final Decision: The bail petitions were allowed, and the petitioners were granted bail under specific conditions.
JUDGMENT
1. These petitions are filed under Sec. 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (' Cr.P.C .' for short), seeking to enlarge the petitioners, who are arraigned as accused No.4 and 2 respectively, on bail in Crime No.57/2021 of Shanthapur Police Station Dist: Bidar, registered for the offences punishable under Ss. 20 (b) (ii) (C) and 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ' NDPS Act ') on the file of Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Bidar.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that on 8/8/2021 at about 08.30 a.m. the complainant - Dy.S.P. Bhalki received credible information that near Kandagol to Wadagoan village Tq: Aurad some persons will illegally transporting the Ganja in Tempo bearing Reg.No.TS-UD- 1094. The complainant secured his staff, videographer, village accountant and panchas. At about 12.40 p.m. they went to Kandagol - Wadagoan road. At 12.57 p.m. they saw one Tempo bearing Reg.No.TS-UD-1094 came from Kandgol village. The police officials stopped the said vehicle, at that time four persons from said vehicle tried to ran-away from there, the police officials caught hold them and enquired their names. They disclosed their names as 1) Omkar s/o Hanamanatappa Halembure, 2) Anil s/o Dashrath Phule, 3) Aslam s/o Gousoddin Mulla and 4) Hajipasha s/o Rashidmiya Kasaab. The accused persons told that they were transporting chilly. When the police officers searched the vehicle, they found that the accused persons were carrying Ganja packets. They found that 592 kgs of Ganja in 274 packets worth of Rs.59,20,000.00 was in the vehicle and they had no any permit or license to transport the same. In this regard a FIR came to be registered. The police after investigation have filed the charge sheet. Their bail petitions under Sec. 439 of Cr.P.C. came to be rejected by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, at Bidar. Hence, the petitioners have filed these petitions.
3. Heard Sri. Nandkishore Boob and Sri. Anilkumar Navadagi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri. Gururaj V. Hasilkar, the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent - State in both the petitions.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners argued that the petitioners are falsely implicated in the case. It is alleged that in all totally 592 kgs Ganja was recovered, but it is clearly mentioned in the Panchanama and statement of witnesses that the said Ganja was not dry powder, but the forming contains wet leaf and flowers iteams along with wet Ganja. The respondent - police have not shown the exact weight of Ganja, but falsely shown as commercial quantity of Ganja. The accused Nos.5 to 8 are already granted bail by the Sessions Court. These petitioners are in judicial custody from 8/8/2021. The petitioners are working as agriculturists and driver. The petitioners are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to offer sureties. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioners prays to allow the petitions.
5. Against this, learned High Court Government Pleader filed objections and argued that if the petitioners are released on bail, they may abscond and they may not appear before the Court. The petitioners are involved in the offence of illegally transportation and selling Ganja. The petitioners being the members of racket involved in such illegal activities. The panchanama was conducted in the presence of Gazzetted Officer. Hence, he prays to reject the petitions.
6. I have perused the material produced before the Court. Admittedly, the offences are not punishable with death or imprisonment for life. Though, in all totally 592 kgs of Ganja was seized in the presence of panchas, but in the panchanama and statement of witnesses it is mentioned that the said Ganja was not dry, but they weighed wet leaf, fruits and flowers items along with wet Ganja. Therefore, the definition of Ganja under Sec. 2 (iii) (b) of NDPS Act states that "ganja, that is, the flowering of fruiting tops of t
The possession of a commercial quantity of drugs under the NDPS Act can bar the grant of bail, especially when the accusation is prima facie well founded and the investigation is pending.
Bail is a rule and rejection is an exception, and the decision to grant or reject bail application should consider the nature and seriousness of the offence, the character of the accused, and the cir....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the small quantity of contraband seized and the prolonged incarceration of the petitioners were influential factors in granting bail under the....
The commercial quantity of contraband and prima facie evidence can be considered as grounds for denying bail under the NDPS Act.
The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the provisions of the NDPS Act, particularly the definition of ganja, in determining the eligibility for bail in the case.
The court may grant bail to the accused under certain conditions, considering the completion of investigation and the prolonged detention of the accused.
The commercial quantity of ganja seized and the application of Section 37 of the NDPS Act influenced the court's decision to dismiss the bail petition.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.