JUDGMENT

1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 07.02.2022 rendered by this Court in RFA No. 956/2018, the instant review petition is filed on the ground that the impugned judgment suffers from an error apparent on the face of the record.

2. The petitioners herein were the appellants in RFA No. 956/2018. The petitioners were originally defendants in the suit in O.S.No. 450/2008 along with several other defendants. The petitioners were deleted from the original suit and a compromise was arrived at between the plaintiffs and some of the defendants and a compromise decree was passed. Aggrieved by the said compromise decree, the petitioners herein preferred RFA No. 956/2018. The said appeal was disposed of as not maintainable for the following reasons:

"6. It is needless to state that the rights determined by way of a compromise petition in the impugned judgment and decree are rights in personam and not right in rem and are normally binding only between the parties to the compromise petition.

7. In the instant case, admittedly, the appellants are not parties to the compromise petition. If they are aggrieved by the compromise, they can always move the Court which recorded the compromise and in