SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 904

N.P.SINGH, N.M.KASLIWAL
Banwari Lal – Appellant
Versus
Chando Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
ANANT PALLI, E.C.AGARWAL, REKHA PALLI, S.M.Ashri

Judgement Key Points

Certainly. Based on the provided legal document, here are the key points:

  1. The order of dismissal of a suit based on a petition of compromise can be challenged and recalled if it is found that the compromise was not lawful or was obtained through fraud or collusion. The Court has the authority to recall such an order if the compromise is not valid within the meaning of the applicable rules (!) (!) .

  2. A petition of compromise must be in writing and signed by the parties involved. The Court must be satisfied that the compromise is lawful before recording it, and the agreement must be capable of being embodied in a decree (!) .

  3. An agreement or compromise that is void or voidable under the Indian Contract Act shall not be deemed lawful within the meaning of the relevant rule. The Court is required to decide whether an adjustment or satisfaction has been lawfully arrived at before recording the compromise (!) (!) .

  4. Orders recording a compromise are judicial orders and acquire the sanctity of a Court decree. Therefore, such orders can be challenged if the compromise is invalid or obtained through fraud, and the Court has the jurisdiction to examine the validity of the compromise even after it has been recorded (!) .

  5. The amendments to the Civil Procedure Code have introduced specific provisions that restrict the remedies available against orders recording compromises, including the abolition of appeals against such orders. However, parties can still challenge the validity of the compromise through appeals against the decree or through other procedural avenues provided under the law (!) (!) .

  6. The Court's power to recall or set aside an order recorded under the rules depends on whether the compromise was lawful, and the Court must apply its judicial mind to the terms before accepting and recording the compromise (!) .

  7. The procedural requirements for recording a compromise are strict, and courts must ensure that all formalities, including signatures and lawful agreement, are duly satisfied before dismissing a suit based on such a compromise (!) .

  8. The legal framework emphasizes that the validity of a compromise can be questioned even after it has been recorded, especially if it is found to be void, voidable, or obtained through fraud or misrepresentation. The Court retains the authority to examine and set aside such compromises to prevent abuse and prolonged litigation (!) .

Please let me know if you need a detailed analysis or specific legal advice related to this document.


JUDGMENT

N. P. SINGH, J.:—Speical leave granted.

2. This appeal has been filed for setting aside an order passed by the High Court on the revision application filed on behalf of the respondent. By the impugned order the learned Judge has held that the trial Court could not have entertained the application filed on behalf of the appellant, for recall of the order recording a compromise alleged to have been entered between the appellant and the respondent.

3. The suit in question had been filed on behalf of the appellant on 14-9-1990. It appears that on 27-2-1991 a petition of compromise was filed, on behalf of the appellant, saying that both parties have entered into a compromise on the basis whereof the appellant had delivered the possession of the disputed land to the respondent. A prayer was made that in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties the suit be dismissed. It may be mentioned that the said petition had not been signed by the contesting respondent or by his counsel. It appears that one Shri Soran Ram, Advocate, had made a note - Thumb impression has been marked in my presence - meaning thereby that thumb impression had been given by the appellant in his prese
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top