S. G. PANDIT
Crest Facility Management – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner.
1. Learned counsel Sri.Abhinay Y.T. for respondents present. Perused the writ petition papers.
2. On perusal of the writ petition papers, it is seen that the petitioner is before this Court questioning the correctness and legality of communication/Annexure-G bearing No.B/C.79/CS-39/KJM & BNC/GMU/CFM/2019 dated 05.04.2019, whereby the petitioner was debarred from participating in any Catering contracts of the Indian Railways.
3. The respondent-Railways invited tenders for Housekeeping, Catering and Loading Unloading support services and the petitioner was one of the successful tenderers in pursuance of the tender notice dated 31.07.2018 in so far as catering services is concerned. Even though the petitioner's tender was accepted, on the ground that tenderer/petitioner failed to execute the work, the petitioner was debarred under the impugned letter dated 05.04.2019 vide Annexure-G. A perusal of Annexure-G impugned letter dated 05.04.2019 would not indicate issuance of any notice before debarring the petitioner from participating in any of the contracts of the Indian Railways.
4. Sri.Abhinay Y.T., learned counsel for the Railways fairly
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.