S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV
Sanath Kumar Murali, S/o. Mr. M. V. Sanath Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward 4(3)(3), Koramangala, Bengaluru – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioner has challenged the order at Annexure-'A' dated 21.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('I.T. Act' for brevity) for the Assessment Year 2016-2017 and has also sought for quashing of the impugned notice dated 21.03.2023 bearing DIN and Notice No. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-23/1051076610(1) issued by respondent No.1 under Section 148 of the I.T. Act for the Assessment Year 2016-2017 at Annexure-'B'.
2. On 03.03.2023, the notice under Section 148A(b) of the I.T. Act came to be issued to the petitioner stating that information was received which suggested that income chargeable to tax for the Assessment Year 2016-2017 has escaped assessment within the meaning of Section 147, detailing the information alongwith the supporting documents. The information is detailed in the Annexure in the form of a table, which is extracted below :
| S. No. | Information description | Source | Amount (Rs.) |
| 1. | TDS statement - sale consideration on sale of immovable property (Section 194IA) | VENKATACHALAPATHI DIBBUR VENKATESAIAH | 5577700 |
This was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.