Back
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Avenue Supermarts Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner in W.P.No.3728/2022 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
2. Writ of Certiorari and/or of any like nature, quashing the impugned notice under sections 238 & 239 of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Act, 2002 bearing No. S.K.A/Horamavu/U.V/P.O/2021-22, dated 27/01/2022 at Annexure-A and
3. Pass such other order as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the instant case, in the interest of justice and equity.
2. The petitioner in W.P.No.21441/2022 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
2. Quashing the Show cause Notice dated 12/09/2022 bearing No. BBMP/Ma.Wa/Na.Yo/419/2022-23 issued by the Respondent No.3 Assistant Direct Town Planning, Mahadevapura, BBMP, vide Annexure-T,
3. Quashing the I
The Corporation cannot take action for encroachments not shown in the Revised Master Plan.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Corporation Officers must comply with the principles enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution of India, treat everyone equally, and not....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
