SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1464

K. S. MUDAGAL, S. RACHAIAH
Sheeba Antony – Appellant
Versus
Antony Peter – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ram Mohan, Advocate, Geetha Menon, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. This appeal is filed by the wife being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dtd. 16/11/2012 in M.C.No.1096/2008 on the file of the I Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru, wherein the Family Court allowed the petition and the marriage of the petitioner/husband and the respondent/wife has been dissolved.

2. The appellant is the respondent and the respondent is the petitioner in the Trial Court.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred henceforth as per their rankings before the Trial Court.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ARE:

4. It is the case of the petitioner/husband that the petitioner married the respondent/wife on 28/1/1995 at Bengaluru as per Christian rites and customs. A son was born out of the said wedlock. The petitioner filed a petition before the Family Court seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty alleging that the respondent was ill- treating the petitioner and suspecting his character and also used to pick up quarrel even for petty reasons etc. Hence, the petition.

5. The respondent/wife appeared by filing objections and denied the allegations made against her. The respondent submits that, the Trial Court has not appreciated the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top