SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 629

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Sreenivas Harish Kumar, J.
Dr. Shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka & Ors. – Respondents
Criminal Petition No. 5031 of 2023 c/w Criminal Appeal No. 1230 of 2023
Decided On : 08-11-2023

Advocates appeared:
Sri C.V.Nagesh, Senior Advocate for Sri Sandeep S. Patil, Advocate, for the Appellant; Sri B.N. Jagadeesh, Addl. SPP, for R1 and R2; Smt. Deepa J, Advocate, for the Respondent.

Headnote:

Bail - Sexual Harassment - Cr.P.C, Atrocities Act - 439, 14(A)(2) - [Section 439 of Cr.P.C, Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989] - The court discussed the gravity of the offences, prima facie evidence, and the influence of the accused in the context of the bail application. The court found that the provisions of the Atrocities Act were wrongly invoked and that there were doubts in the materials collected by the investigator, leading to the decision to grant bail to the accused.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved allegations of sexual harassment against the head of a Mutt by two girls who were inmates of a hostel. The accused filed bail applications which were rejected by the trial court, citing prima facie evidence of his involvement in the harassment.

Finding of the Court:

The court found doubts in the materials collected by the investigator, including discrepancies in the statements of the girls and other witnesses, and the conduct of the girls. It also noted that the provisions of the Atrocities Act were wrongly invoked. Consequently, the court decided to grant bail to the accused.

Issues: The issues revolved around the gravity of the offences, the existence of prima facie evidence, and the likelihood of the accused influencing witnesses and tampering with evidence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the doubts in the materials collected by the investigator, the wrongly invoked provisions of the Atrocities Act, and the potential influence of the accused in granting bail.

Final Decision: The court allowed the criminal appeal and the criminal petition, setting aside the previous order and granting bail to the accused under certain conditions.

ORDER

1. Criminal Petition No.5031/2023 is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C ., Criminal Appeal No.1230/2023 is filed under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereina fter referred to as 'Atrocities Act' for short), challenging the order dated 31.01.2023 in Crl.Misc.No.1394/2022. The petitioner in Crl.P.No .5031/2023 and the appellant in Crl.A.No.1230/2023 is the same person (he is referred to accused No.1 for the sake of convenience). He filed two criminal miscellaneous petitions 1394/2022 and 1395/2022 under Section 439 of Cr.P .C., before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge and Special Court, Chitradurga, seeking bail and as they were dismissed, he has approached this court. As two cases arise out of FIR No.387/2022 registered by Rural Police Station , Chitradurga, they are disposed of by a common order.

2. The prosecution case, stated briefly, is as follows:

Two girls, A and B were inmates of Akkamahadevi Hostel run by Murugharajendra Mutt, Chitradurga when they were students of a high school. On 24.07.2022, A and B left the hostel around 04.30pm and reached Bengaluru around 10.00pm. An auto rickshaw driver took them to Cottonpet police station. The police telephoned Smt. Soubhagya Basavarajan of Chitradurga, who came over to Bengaluru around 04.00am on 25.07.2022 and took the girls to Chitradurga. The girls stayed in her house for a few days and during their stay in her house, the girls disclosed about the sexual harassment on them by accused No.1 who is the head of Murugharajendra Mutt being a pontiff. On 26.08.2022, Smt. Soubhagyamma took the girls to an organization called 'Odanadi' at Mysuru. As the girls revealed of sexual harassment on them, the office bearers of Odanadi produced the girls before the Child Welfare Committee, Mysuru. After the counseling of the girls, the Probation Officer, Mysuru District, pursuant to an order passed by the District Child Welfare Officer, Mysuru made a report to Nazarabad police station at 10.30pm on 26.08.2022 about sexual harassment on the two girls. Based on the report, FIR was registered in Crime No.155/2022 at Nazarabad police station, Mysuru, for the offences punishable under Section 376(2) of IPC, Section 5(l) read with Section 6 and Section 17 of the POCSO Act. In this report apart from implicating accused No.1, there were also allegations against Basavadithya, Gangadharaiah, an Advocate by profession, Smt. Rashmi, the warden of the hostel and one Paramashivaiah. It is stated that these persons helped accused No.1 commit sexual abuse on the girls. Later-on the FIR registered at Mysuru was transferred to Chitradurga Rural police station as the latter police station had territorial jurisdiction. Chitradurga Rural police registered FIR in Crime No.387/2022. The investigation led to filing of charge sheet for the offences under Sections 376(2)(n), 376(DA), 376(3), 201, 202 and 506 read with Sections 34 and 37 of IPC, Section 5(l) read with Section 6 and Section 17 of the POCSO Act, Section 3(1)(w)(i)(ii) and Section 3(2)(v)(va) of SC/ST Act, Section 3(f) and Section 7 of Religious Institutions (Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1988 and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. Since one of the girls belongs to scheduled caste, the provisions of Atrocities Act were invoked.

3. I have heard the arguments of Sri C.V.Nagesh, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Sandeep Patil learned counsel for accused No.1 and Sri B. N.Jagadeesh, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for respondents No.1 and 2/State, Sri Srinivasa D C, learned counsel for respondent No.3 in Crl.A.No.1230/2023 and Smt. Deepa J, learned counsel for respondent No.3 in Crl.P.No.5031/2023.

4. The trial court rejected the bail applications ascribing the reasons that the materials produced before the court would prima-facie indicate involvement of accused No.1 in subjecting the girls to sexual harassment

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top