Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Ignoring Court-Mandated PWD Safety Report Invalidates Municipal Order: J&K&L High Court
06 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Reserves Verdict in Raju Tampering Conviction Plea
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
S. G. PANDIT, VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Savitri M Dandin – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT/ORDER
S.G.PANDIT, J. - Since these writ petitions are based on common facts and arising out of common order passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Belagavi (for short, 'Tribunal') in Application Nos.232/2018, 2203/2018, 2732/2018, 3018/2018 and 10101/2020, the same are taken up together, heard and disposed of by this common order.
2. Heard the learned HCGP Sri. V.S. Kalasurmath for the petitioners/State Authorities and learned counsels Sri. Aditya R Chakragiri and Sri. Suresh Bhat for the respondents and perused the writ petition papers.
3. Respondents herein, retired employees and legal heirs of deceased employees of AYUSH Department, were before the Tribunal in the aforesaid Applications challenging Government Orders dtd. 18/9/2017 and 21/9/2017, wherein their request for fixation of pay as on 1/1/1970 and to count their ad-hoc services for the purpose of grant of increment and pension was rejected and in two writ petitions, prayer before the Tribunal was to issue direction to the respondent
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Rules permitted counting of past service for the purpose of increment and pension, and the delay in approaching the Tribunal was not a val....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of employees to have their past services counted for pensionary benefits, as per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the benefits of pension to daily wagers should be calculated from the date of their initial appointments, as per the Government Resolution dat....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the continuous service of daily wagers from the date of their initial appointments should be counted for the purpose of pension, as clarified ....
The court affirmed the right of petitioners, appointed on compassionate grounds, to be considered for regular pay-scale from their initial appointment date, with restrictions on arrears limited to th....
The Government's intention, as per the Government Order, was clear in favor of providing the benefit of counting the past service rendered by the writ petitioners in the Society towards qualifying se....
Petitioners entitled to modified compassionate appointment orders at regular pay scale from initial appointment date, with arrears limited to three years prior to filing date.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article