SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 680

K. NATARAJAN
Kaningat Rajan – Appellant
Versus
Ample Technologies Private Limited – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Parina Lalla, Advocate, H.N. Narendra Dev, Advocate, V. Sanjay Krishna, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. This petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.3 under Sec. 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.4639/2020, pending on the file of XXVIII ACMM, Bengaluru, arising out of PCR No.636/2020.

2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent for respondent No.1.

3. The case of the petitioner is that the respondent has filed a private complaint under Sec. 200 of Cr.P.C. read with Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (for short ' N.I. Act '), alleging that the cheque was issued by the company-accused No.1 and accused No.2 and 3 are the Directors of the company. The cheque was dishonored. Hence, the complaint came to be filed. The trial Court took the cognizance against accused Nos.1 to 3 and issued summons. Accused No.3-the present petitioner is challenging the criminal proceedings against him.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that accused No.2 is the Managing Director of accused No.1-company. On behalf of accused No.1, accused No.2 has issued the cheque which was signed by accused No.2, therefore, the proceedings against accused No.3 is not sustainable. Ther

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top