Back
V SRISHANANDA
Preetesh R Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
V Srishananda, J. - Heard Sri.Gopal Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri.Vinayaka V.S., learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent-State.
2. The present petition is filed by accused No.1 under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. with the following prayer:
'Wherefore the petitioner humbly pray before the Honourable court to be pleased to allow the petition and be pleased to direct the respondent Halasuru Gate Police to release the petitioner in the event of his arrest in Crime No.305/2022, the LIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, at Bengaluru registered for offence punishable u/s 420 and 506 of Indian Penal Code imposing any conditions for which act of kindness the petitioner shall ever pray.'
3. Brief facts of the case is as under:
The complaint came to be lodged by one Bharath kumar Rawal son of late Bhavar Lal Rawal, whereby Halasurugate Police Station, Bengaluru city, registered a case in Crime No.305/2022 on 23.12.2022 for the offences punishable under Section 420 and 506 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC')
4. The gist of the complaint averments reveal that the complainant and the accused were known to each other and there was business transaction
The main legal point established is that the grant of bail should consider the accused's criminal antecedents, presence in the FIR, and the potential prejudice to the trial if findings are made at an....
Point of Law : Grant of bail – Intention to cheat – Recovery of ornaments – Considering Period of detention.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
