SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 797

ALOK ARADHE, VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
Shilpa Rani – Appellant
Versus
Suresh H. R. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
B.S. Prasad, Advocate, K.B. Chandrashekar Swamy, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL, J. - This appeal under Sec. 28(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, has been filed against the judgment and decree dtd. 20/4/2016 passed in M.C.No.3/2010 by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Channagiri, by which the petition filed by the respondent/husband seeking dissolution of marriage, was allowed.

2. Brief facts giving rise to filing of this appeal are that the appellant/wife and respondent/husband got married on 13/11/2005 as per the Hindu customs and rituals. The respondent/husband has averred that he is from a respectable family and his father is a government servant. It is further averred that the appellant/wife was happily residing in the matrimonial home initially after the marriage and out of the wedlock a male child has been born. It is further averred that the appellant/wife was not discharging her marital obligations properly, she used to quarrel with the respondent/husband and she had not shown any interest in cooking. It is further averred that mother of the respondent/husband is suffering from skin disease, hence the appellant/wife used to disrespect her and did not allow her to touch household articles. It is further averred that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top