SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 877

K. NATARAJAN
Khaleel Ul Rehman – Appellant
Versus
Sharaffunnisa Muniri – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mohammad Niyaz S., Advocate, Sandesh J. Chouta, Advocate, Ismail Muneeb Musba, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The Crl.P.No.8508/2022 is filed by the petitioner under Sec. 482 of Cr.P.C for setting aside the order passed in Crl.Misc.No.506/2019 passed by the VI Addl. Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru on the application filed by the respondent under Sec. 125 of Cr.P.C for quashing the entire criminal proceedings.

2. The W.P.No.14494/2022 filed by the same petitioner under Article 226 and 227 of Constitution of India for setting aside the order dtd. 19/4/2022 passed by the VI Additional Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru in Crl.Misc.No.506/2019 for having granted maintenance of Rs.25, 000.00 per month to the respondent which is under challenge.

3. Heard the arguments of learned senior counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for respondent.

4. For convenience, rank of the parties before the Trial Court is retained.

5. The case of petitioner before the trial court is that she had married the father of the respondents before the trial court by name Moheddin Muniri on 26/8/1989 in Bhatkal on the decision of both the families after the death of the wife of Moheddin Muniri, even though he had the children who are the petitioners before this Court. She further contended t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top