SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 879

J. M. KHAZI
Tirupati – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Srinivas B.Naik, Advocate, Girija S.Hiremath, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

J.M. Khazi, J. - Petitioner who is arraigned as accused No.1 is before this Court under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to release him on bail for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(i), 302, 201, 114 of Indian Penal Code (for short, 'I.P.C.') and Sections 4, 8 and 12 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, 'the POCSO Act').

2. The petitioner/accused No.1 has contended that he is no way involved in the alleged incident and he is falsely implicated. From the perusal of the statement of witnesses creates doubt as to his presence at the time of incident. There is no prima facie material to connect him to the alleged crime. Already accused No.2 to 5 have been granted bail. The petitioner/accused No.1 also stands on the same footing. The entire material placed on record are considered, there is nothing to connect the petitioner/ accused No.1 with the alleged crime. Investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed and therefore, his custodial presence is no longer required. He is in judicial custody since 19.04.2022. He is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed.

3. Learned High Court Governme

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top