SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 728

V SRISHANANDA
Sachin – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sri. Sachin M Mahajan., Advocate, for the Appellant; Sri.Gururaj V. Hasilkar Hcgp, Veershetty B.K & Sri. B.K. Patil, for the Respondent

ORDER

1. Heard Sri Sachin M. Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gururaj V. Hasilkar, learned High Court Government Pleader for first respondent - State and Sri Veershetty and B.K. Patil, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and perused the records.

2. This Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC. with the following prayer:

"WHEREFORE, the petitioner most respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to call for records and quash the order dated 17.09.2022 passed by the learned II Addl. Dist. & sitting at Basavakalyan in Crl.RP Sessions Judge, Bidar, No.5002/2021, wherein the learned Sessions set aside the order dated 12.10.2020 passed by the learned Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC at Humnabad in CC No.192/2017 and allow the application filed by the respondent herein under section 319 CrPC and array the petitioner herein as accused No.2 in CC No.192/2017 for the alleged offence punishable under section 323, 504, 506, R/w 34 of IPC, in the interest of justice."

3. Brief facts of the case which are necessary for disposal of the petition are as under:

Second respondent filed a private complaint which was registered in PC No.20/2017 on the file of the Principal Civil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top