SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 705

H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD
Employees State Insurance Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Modern Traders – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Geetha Devi M.P., Advocate, Harikrishna S. Holla, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. This appeal is filed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'the ESI Corporation') under Sec. 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the ESI Act') challenging the order dtd. 29/9/2014 passed by the Employees State Insurance Court at Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as 'the ESI Court') in E.S.I. Application No.20/2010, whereby the application has been allowed in part and applicant was held liable to pay the contribution towards the wages and salaries for the year 2006-2007 to the ESI Corporation, but in respect of the years 2004-2005 and 2005-2006, the same has been rejected.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their rankings before the E.S.I. Court.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant was carrying on the business in steel trading for which it uses cranes and also engaged the services of loaders and un-loaders and for the services rendered by the loaders and un-loaders the applicant was paying coolie and there is no master and servant relationship between the applicant and the loaders and un-loaders. Hence, they are not the employees as defined un

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top