SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 772

RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
Anand G. Mulu Rathod – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ramesh Chigari, Advocate, B.N.Jamadar, Advocate, Vasant G.Holeyannavar, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. This revision was filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge and C.J.M., Dharwad in C.C.No.290/2007 dtd. 4/6/2011 and confirmed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad in Crl.A.No.55/2011 vide judgment dtd. 9/11/2012 whereby the accused-revision petitioner was convicted for the offences punishable under Ss. 279 and 304(A) of IPC.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred with the original ranks occupied by them before the Trial Court.

3. The brief factual matrix leading to the case are that the accused is the driver of the K.S.R.T.C. bus No.KA25/F 2070 and on 30/4/2007 he drove the bus in a rash and negligent manner on Corporation Road, near Kalabhavan at 01:10 p.m. and while taking turn in high speed, the passenger Vidyavati Patil, who was in the bus thrown out from the front door of the bus and she fell down and sustained injuries. She was immediately shifted to the hospital, but she succumbed because of the injuries subsequently. In this regard a complaint came to be lodged and crime was registered. The investigating officer visited the spot drawn t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top