SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 745

J. M. KHAZI
ICICI Lombard Ins. co. ltd – Appellant
Versus
Rayavva – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Subhash Mallapur, Advocate, S.S. Sajjanshetty, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. While MFA No.201195/2016 is filed by respondent No.2/insurance company to exonerate it from the liability of paying the compensation, MFA Crob No.200019/2018 is filed by the by the petitioners to enhance the compensation.

2. Since these two appeals are arising out of a common judgment and award, they are clubbed together and disposed of by this common judgment.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to by their rank before the Tribunal.

4. It is the case of the petitioners that they are the wife, daughter and parents of deceased-Tippanna Totad. On 27/2/2012 deceased and his son-Vishwaradhya were proceeding in Tum-Tum Auto Rickshaw bearing Reg.No.KA33-6910 from the Abbe Tumkur to Yadgiri. On Abbe Tumkur - Mudanal road near the land of Ishwarapa, another Tum-Tum Auto Rickshaw bearing Reg.No.KA-33-9715 (hereinafter referred to as 'offending vehicle') driven by one Mallu @ Mallikarjun came from the opposite side, in a rash or negligent manner and dashed against the auto rickshaw in which deceased and his son were travelling. Due to the impact, deceased sustained grievous injuries. Initially he was taken to Government Hospital, Yadgiri and on the advis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top