B. Mohammed Kunhi, S/o. Late P. Sayyad Ali vs Abdul Saleem Hassan, S/o. Ahmad Hassan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Kar) 84

M. I. ARUN
B. Mohammed Kunhi, S/o. Late P. Sayyad Ali – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Saleem Hassan, S/o. Ahmad Hassan – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Sri. M. Sudhakar Pai, Adv.
For the Respondents: Sri. Syed Akbar Pasha, Adv.

ORDER :

1. The respondent claiming to be the owner of the suit schedule property and alleging that the petitioners are the tenants, filed O.S.No.256/2016 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Mangaluru with the following prayer :

IV. That the Plaintiff values the subject matter and the relief claimed in this suit at Rs.7,50,000/-for the purpose of Court Fee and jurisdiction, and herewith pays the Court Fee of Rs.48,375/-under Section 21 and 41(2) of the Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act through the Banker's Cheque/D.D. dated 18.11.2016 No.000943 drawn on the Bank of Baroda, B.C. Road Branch, Bantwal.

V. That the Plaintiff hereby claims-

(a) Quit and surrender the vacant possession of the plaint schedule Premises to the Plaintiff

[Yearly rent Rs.65,000 + premium

6,50,000= Rs. 7,15,000/-

[This relief is valued @

Rs. 7,15,000/- and Court Fee paid u/S.41(2) of K.C.F. & S.V. Act)

Rs.7,15,000/-

(b) Mesne Profit @ Rs.500/- per day from 03.09.2016 to 01.11.2016,

i.e. 2 months = 15000x2=30,000/-

[This relief is valued at Rs.30,000/- under Section 21 of K.C.F.. & S.V. Act)

Rs.30,000/-

[This relief is valued

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Kar) 84

M. I. ARUNB. Mohammed Kunhi, S/o. Late P. Sayyad Ali – AppellantVersusAbdul Saleem Hassan, S/o. Ahmad Hassan – Respondent

M. I. ARUN
B. Mohammed Kunhi, S/o. Late P. Sayyad Ali – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Saleem Hassan, S/o. Ahmad Hassan – Respondent