HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
S. R. Ashwini, W/O. G Harish – Appellant
Versus
G. Harish, S/O. Guddalli Giddappa – Respondent
ORDER :
All the three petitions are filed by the wife calling in question the judgment and award passed by the Family Courts in dismissing the petitions filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. filed by the respective petitioners – wife on the ground that in spite of decree of restitution of conjugal rights is passed against the wife but the wife did not join companionship of the respondent – husband. Therefore, the Family Courts have dismissed the petitions filed for maintenance.
2. Though the above said three petitions are ordered under different facts and circumstances but one common fact involved in these cases are that the petitioners were constrained to live separately from the respondents – husband on the ground that the respondents – husband have subjected the petitioners – wife to cruelty and ill-treatment. Therefore, the petitioners are living separately and thus, filed claim petitions praying for maintenance by invoking provisions of Section 125 of Cr.P.C. by filing respective petitions. The Family Courts have dismissed the petitions filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. on the ground that respondents – husband have filed petitions invoking the provision of Section 9 of the Hindu M
Bhuwan Mohan Singh v Meena and Ors (2015) 6 SCC 353: AIR 2014 SC 2875
Captain Ramesh Chander Kaushal v. Mrs. Veena Kaushal and Ors.
Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha and Anr. (2011) 1 SCC 141: 2011 Cri LJ 96 (SC)
Chaturbhuj v. Sitabai (2008) 2 SCC 316: AIR 2008 SC 530
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.