M. NAGAPRASANNA
Shylaja S. R. , D/O M. Raju – Appellant
Versus
Hareesha A. , S/O Late Annayyappa – Respondent
ORDER :
The petitioner is before this Court seeking quashment of an order dated 12-06-2023 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal on I.A.No.II in M.C.No.104 of 2020 and allowing I.A.No.II as prayed for.
2. Facts adumbrated are as follows:-
The 1st petitioner is the wife of the respondent, her husband. The petitioners 2 and 3 are the two children born from the wedlock who are aged 11 years and 6 years. The 1st petitioner and the respondent got married on 09-05-2012 and as observed hereinabove, the two have two children born from the wedlock. It appears that the relationship between the two flounders and on floundering of the relationship the two are before the Family Court in M.C.No.104 of 2020. The issue in the lis does not concern the merit of the claim of parties in M.C.No.104 of 2020. The wife files an application in I.A.No.II invoking Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking grant of interim maintenance at Rs.36,000/-per month. The concerned Court, after analyzing assets and liabilities statements produced by both the husband and the wife, orders maintenance at Rs.18,000/-per month. It is calling that in question the said order, the wife is before this
Chander Parkash Bodh Raj v. Shila Rani Chander Prakash
Jasbir Kaur Sehgal v. District Judge, Dehradun
Ramesh Chander Kaushal v. Veena Kaushal
Reema Salkan v. Sumer Singh Salkan
Reema Salkan v. Sumer Singh Salkan
Reema Salkan v. Sumer Singh Salkan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.