JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The instant revision application is directed against the judgment dated 28th January, 2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro in Original Maintenance Case No. 81 of 2015 filed by the petitioner under Section 125 Cr.P.C. whereby the learned Family Court has allowed a maintenance of Rs. 30,000/- per month in favour of the petitioner-wife against her claim of Rs. 60,000/- per month.

3. The case of the petitioner as it appears from the plaint is that her marriage with the O.P. was solemnized on 01.05.1985 as per Hindu rites and custom at Hajipur, Bihar. After marriage, they lived together as husband and wife and out of their wedlock, they have been blessed with one daughter namely Priyanka Jha on 30.03.1987 and one son named Rishav Kumar on 16.04.1993.

The further case of the petitioner is that they lived together as husband and wife for a limited period and thereafter the O.P. started quarrelling with her for no reasons, whatsoever, and started taunting her by saying that he is a meritorious engineer, graduated from a reputed institute, employed in a senior position and he is a wealthy person